With the two new MacBook Pro laptops, a 16-inch and a 14-inch model, introduced by Apple this month, the entire MacBook laptop line has shifted to Apple’s own M-series chips, and away from Intel. This shift means more options for new MacBook buyers to consider, as well as additional considerations about ports, screens, webcams and power — especially graphics power.
The MacBook Pro started life in 2006, as a successor to Apple’s PowerBook line of laptops, and part of the first wave of Intel-powered Macs. The Intel/Apple partnership lasted 15 years, and now we’re down to the last couple of available Intel Macs, an older Mac Mini and the 21.5- and 27-inch iMacs. I doubt we’ll see any more, as the Mac line continues to go all-in on Apple’s own chips, allowing the company to control the design of the hardware, the OS and the CPU.
The new models are available to buy now, although some configurations already show long wait times before shipping.
Last year’s initial wave of M1 Macs made for some confusing buying choices. The less expensive MacBook Air and more expensive 13-inch MacBook Pro used almost identical M1 chips (with a single extra GPU core in the Pro), despite a $300 difference in their starting prices. The $699 Mac Mini? Same chip! The upshot at the time was that the MacBook Air remained the most universally useful choice for most people.
The new 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro laptops represent a much wider gap between the Air and Pro models. It’s also a way Apple can lure in higher-end creative pros who need the graphics power — previously only available in select Intel Macs — for video editing, content creation and 3D work. Before now, the M1 Macs were not always powerful enough for more complex workloads.
Read more: M1 Max vs. M1 Pro vs. M1: Apple’s MacBook Pro chips compared
By adding the M1 Pro and M1 Max system-on-chip parts (sometimes called an SOC, or more casually referred to as the MacBook’s “chip”), these really become pro-level machines, and will do a better job of attracting professional buyers, who are used to spending many, many thousands on their mission-critical work rigs.
Let’s look at the current lineup and see how the new announcements have changed the buying calculations:
Current MacBooks compared
|14-inch MacBook Pro||16-inch MacBook Pro||MacBook Air (13-inch, M1)||13-inch MacBook Pro (M1)|
|CPU||M1 Pro or M1 Max||M1 Pro or M1 Max||M1||M1|
|No. of GPU cores||14 (up to 32)||16 (up to 32)||7||8|
|Screen size||14.2 inches||16.2 inches||13.3 inches||13.3 inches|
|Screen resolution||3,024×1,964 pixels||3,456×2,234 pixels||2,560×1,600 pixels||2,560×1,600 pixels|
|Networking||802.11ax Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0||802.11ax Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0||802.11ax Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0||802.11ax Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0|
|Connections||Thunderbolt USB-C x3, HDMI, SDXC card, MagSafe 3||Thunderbolt USB-C x3, HDMI, SDXC card, MagSafe 3||Thunderbolt USB-C x2||Thunderbolt USB-C x2|
|Weight||3.5 lbs||4.7 lbs||2.8 lbs||3.0 lbs|
|US starting price||$1,999||$2,499||$999||$1,299|
The new models
This is the first brand-new screen size for a MacBook since the 15-inch Pro went to 16 inches in 2019 (the iMac added a 24-inch version this past summer). Along with that, it actually gets both thicker and heavier. The trade-off is that the thicker body allows for all those extras, like the resurrected HDMI and SD card ports.
The bigger screen covers even more of the top panel, with thinner bezels. So thin, in fact, that the webcam has been reduced to a notch, cutting into the display itself, much like on an iPhone. So far, I’ve heard mixed reactions to that, but I think the better 1080p-resolution webcam more than makes up for it. I’ve used the 1080p webcams in the 27-inch iMac and newer 24-inch iMac, and it makes a huge difference in video meetings.
Keep in mind these shopping notes are based on the on-paper specs for the new MacBooks, plus my long experience testing and reviewing MacBooks, which goes back to the very first MacBook Pro in 2006 and the first MacBook Air in 2008. For more in-depth notes, make sure to check out my review of the 14-inch MacBook Pro.
If you’re more about portability than the big screen, especially if you output to a larger display, the 14-inch feels (on paper) like the sweet spot for portability and power.
Read our 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro review.
Just about everything I said about the 14-inch MacBook Pro applies here as well. The two devices are remarkably similar, and you get both with either the M1 Pro or the M1 Max. Both also share the same heat pipe cooling system. New ports? The same. Notch-based 1080 camera? Same. No more Touch Bar? Same. The main difference, spec-wise, is that the 14-inch starts with some less powerful M1 options, with a base of eight CPU and 14 GPU cores. The 16-inch starts with 10 CPU and 16 GPU cores in its version of the M1 Pro. Both support up to the 10 CPU and 32 GPU cores version of the M1 Max chip.
To spec out a 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro with the closest matching specs, you end up with that M1 Pro 10 CPU/16 GPU chip, plus 16GB RAM and 512GB storage. On the 14-inch version, that will cost $2,299. In the 16-inch, it’s $2,499. So you basically pay a $200 premium for a 2-inch-larger screen. (The 16-inch maxes out at over $6,000.)
And it could certainly be worth that. The previous 16-inch MacBook Pro was pretty impressive to look at. As opposed to the power-plus-portability pitch of the 14-inch Pro, the 16-inch feels like it’s for people who want a bit of the feel of a big-screen desktop, without actually having a desktop.
Read our 16-inch Apple MacBook Pro review.
The existing models
At first, I was somewhat wary of jumping into an M1 MacBook Air. I was worried about compatibility issues with things like Adobe software and about overall performance compared to the trusted old Intel MacBook Air.
But after nearly a year, I can say the Intel-to-M1 transition has been relatively smooth. The best thing I can say about the M1 chip is that it’s largely transparent to the everyday MacBook Air user, which is exactly what you want from a big under-the-hood change like this.
Apple’s Rosetta emulation, for software not yet optimized for the M1, still runs most programs just as well as it did under Intel chips. Key Adobe software and other creative apps were updated for native M1 support, with more on the way. I’ve run into occasional problems with gaming apps or some drivers, and support apps for things like a label printer and some 3D-printing software.
Read our Apple MacBook Air M1 (Late 2020) review.
MacBook Pro (13-inch, M1)
The first M1 MacBook Pro was a tougher sell than the Air. There was nothing wrong with it, but the line between the Pro and Air wasn’t as distinct as it might have been. The main things that stood out about the 13-inch M1 Pro versus the M1 MacBook Air are the Touch Bar, a slightly brighter screen and better cooling (it had a fan).
With the new Pro models, the 13-inch feels even further out to sea, unlikely to be updated ever again. The good news is, if you were going to buy a 13-inch Pro, the MacBook Air is pretty much just as good and can be configured with more RAM and storage to suit your needs. The bad news is, if you want to shift from 13-inch Pro to 14-inch Pro, the starting price jumps up by $600.
My default advice remains the same, at least for now. Most mainstream laptop shoppers should start with the MacBook Air and see if that’s enough laptop for them. If the ports, better camera or graphics power of the M1 Pro and M1 Max laptops feels like something you need, the decision comes down to portability versus screen size. And if you’re the one Touch Bar die-hard out there, you’d better pick up the 13-inch MacBook Pro while you still can.